Every inspection runs the same ordered debate. Kimi K2.6 sees the photos, Hermes 4 70B argues the codes, the Moderator scores it, the Belediye Agent countersigns — and then a human engineer has the last click.
Reads approved PDF/DWG drawings
MODEL · kimi-k2.6
Plan vs site rebar diff (rules compute, Hermes narrates)
MODEL · rules + hermes-4-70b
TBDY 2018 / TS 500 compliance (rules compute, Hermes narrates)
MODEL · rules + hermes-4-70b
EXIF / marker / hash dup (rules compute, Hermes narrates)
MODEL · rules + hermes-4-70b
AFAD zone × soil × floors (rules compute, Hermes narrates)
MODEL · rules + hermes-4-70b
Steel class, corrosion
MODEL · kimi-k2.6
Concrete cover estimation
MODEL · kimi-k2.6
Synthesizes all findings
MODEL · hermes-4-70b
Independent municipal reviewer (pour-approval gate)
MODEL · hermes-4-70b
01
Kimi K2.6 reads the approved PDF drawing. One shot, structured plan JSON out.
02
Site analysis
GEOMFRAUDSEISM
Rule engines compute the diff (counts, EXIF, AFAD lookup). Hermes 4 70B narrates each finding in parallel — verdict math stays auditable, prose stays agentic.
03
Kimi K2.6 close-up + cover reads with reference-marker calibration.
04
Rule engine over TBDY 2018 + TS 500 whitelist RAG. Hermes 4 70B writes the violation narrative.
05
Hermes 4 70B weighs the 6 specialist reports, emits score + verdict.
06
Independent municipal reviewer. Hard rail: cannot uphold a REJECT.